Under the white or green dress we are all the same, communicating through the language or code of medicine or the nurse who has their shift at the moment?
Imagine there is this person on a hospital bed in the ER.
They cannot communicate with him so they have sensors,
to measure blood pressure, maybe cranial pressure, the air flow, O2, number of breaths, speed, and anything that could be an indiction
All this becomes a language, to translate all that the person cannot say with his own mouth,
but the language has to fit the medical terms and indications, the medical personel communicates this language through books, and years of study
and hopefully someone could have shared the patient's history, a family member or the doctors had seen their previous state, or if it was a sudden accident, then
so the sleeping person becomes what can be seen or measured, but not talked to.
So they say it's a young guy at about 30-35 years old, of medium hight and around 76 Kg, but since he has been here for a while his muscle mass has been reduced a lot and replaced with a lot of fluids of his own body reacting with the medicine and the imobility.
Offcourse mobilization is part of the medical approaches but is not enough to mobilize all this fluids and emotions.
So there are a lot of translations and discourse with the person's initial state and the current state which is fragile and constantly changing. In each change the personel rushes to prescribe some medicine or treatment, or watch for reactions. But isn't the healthy person going into continuous changes all the time? When we're happy when we're sad, when we cough, if we think about the past or the future. Maybe this seemingly sleepy mind is going through some cognitive travel at the time and each change is ''normal'' .
They look at the outside, the look at the screens, they look at the table, they look at the books but they are not looking at what is in between all these. The person. A bit harsh to say but hardly they look at the person, rather than the disease.
Whoever we are or have been, however how many coats and tittles we have changed or shared, under this bed, or under this skin we are all the same.
a sack of emotions and fluidity.
The fluidity apparently gets affected by movement, as physics taught us. But under this situation it's the medicine who decides. What our future will be?
What kind of language do we have to speak?
How the language of the body is interpreted under conditions of lack of verbal language.
What exactly is the language of medicine, and are there other actors playing along this game?
What happens when the language fails or succeeds? Is the perceived success or faillure according to the tools known and observed or could they be more reasons, beyond the measurements of the medical equipment and research papers?
Would be interesting to compare the approaches of aternative and the western medicine in that.
mandra meditation
They cannot communicate with him so they have sensors,
to measure blood pressure, maybe cranial pressure, the air flow, O2, number of breaths, speed, and anything that could be an indiction
All this becomes a language, to translate all that the person cannot say with his own mouth,
but the language has to fit the medical terms and indications, the medical personel communicates this language through books, and years of study
and hopefully someone could have shared the patient's history, a family member or the doctors had seen their previous state, or if it was a sudden accident, then
so the sleeping person becomes what can be seen or measured, but not talked to.
So they say it's a young guy at about 30-35 years old, of medium hight and around 76 Kg, but since he has been here for a while his muscle mass has been reduced a lot and replaced with a lot of fluids of his own body reacting with the medicine and the imobility.
Offcourse mobilization is part of the medical approaches but is not enough to mobilize all this fluids and emotions.
So there are a lot of translations and discourse with the person's initial state and the current state which is fragile and constantly changing. In each change the personel rushes to prescribe some medicine or treatment, or watch for reactions. But isn't the healthy person going into continuous changes all the time? When we're happy when we're sad, when we cough, if we think about the past or the future. Maybe this seemingly sleepy mind is going through some cognitive travel at the time and each change is ''normal'' .
They look at the outside, the look at the screens, they look at the table, they look at the books but they are not looking at what is in between all these. The person. A bit harsh to say but hardly they look at the person, rather than the disease.
Whoever we are or have been, however how many coats and tittles we have changed or shared, under this bed, or under this skin we are all the same.
a sack of emotions and fluidity.
The fluidity apparently gets affected by movement, as physics taught us. But under this situation it's the medicine who decides. What our future will be?
What kind of language do we have to speak?
How the language of the body is interpreted under conditions of lack of verbal language.
What exactly is the language of medicine, and are there other actors playing along this game?
What happens when the language fails or succeeds? Is the perceived success or faillure according to the tools known and observed or could they be more reasons, beyond the measurements of the medical equipment and research papers?
Would be interesting to compare the approaches of aternative and the western medicine in that.
mandra meditation
Comments
Post a Comment